Trump Announces US Withdrawal from World Health Organization

Trump 2 2 Dashing News

In a bold and controversial move, former President Donald Trump announced the United States’ withdrawal from the World Health Organization (WHO) during his first day back in the White House. This decision has sparked significant criticism from public health experts and political leaders, both domestically and internationally.


A History of Tensions with the WHO

Trump has long been a critic of the WHO, questioning its efficacy and independence. Back in July 2020, his administration initiated a withdrawal from the organisation as the Covid-19 pandemic ravaged the globe. However, this move was reversed by then-President Joe Biden, who restored US membership in one of his first actions after taking office in 2021.

The renewed withdrawal was formalised through an executive order signed by Trump. The order cited several reasons for the decision:

  • Mishandling of the Covid-19 Pandemic: The WHO’s response to the outbreak originating in Wuhan, China, was deemed inadequate.

  • Failure to Implement Reforms: Trump highlighted a lack of progress in adopting necessary changes within the organisation.

  • Political Influence: Concerns were raised about undue influence from certain member states on WHO operations.


Financial Disparities and Accusations Against the WHO

During the signing of the executive order, Trump emphasised his belief that the US was contributing disproportionately to the WHO’s budget compared to other countries. In 2020, he accused the organisation of aiding China in allegedly covering up the origins of Covid-19 and enabling its global spread.

While the WHO has not yet issued a formal response to this latest decision, the move reignites debates about the organisation’s role and effectiveness in managing global health crises.


Bipartisan Reactions and Expert Criticism

Reactions to Trump’s decision have been mixed, with notable voices expressing concern over the potential fallout:

  • Bipartisan Concerns:

    • In 2020, lawmakers from both parties criticised Trump’s initial withdrawal. Then-House Speaker Nancy Pelosi labelled it “an act of true senselessness.”

    • Republican Senator Lamar Alexander, who chaired the Senate Health Committee at the time, also disagreed with the decision.

  • Expert Opinions:

    • Dr. Ashish Jha, former White House Covid-19 response coordinator, called the withdrawal a “strategic error.” He warned that it could create a leadership vacuum within the WHO, potentially allowing China to exert greater influence.

    • Lawrence Gostin, a public health law expert at Georgetown University, described the move as “a grievous wound to world health and to the US.”


The Broader Implications of Withdrawal

Critics argue that the US withdrawal weakens the WHO’s capacity to manage global health emergencies. The organisation relies heavily on American funding, expertise, and personnel, particularly in areas such as tracking and combating global influenza outbreaks.

Trump’s executive action also instructs the Secretary of State and the Office of Management and Budget to halt future transfers of US resources to the WHO. However, legal experts point out that a complete withdrawal takes one year and requires continued funding during this period.

Gostin noted potential legal and factual issues with Trump’s approach, stating that “this unilateral action undermines global norms and US commitments.”


What’s Next for Global Health Governance?

The decision to withdraw from the WHO marks a significant shift in US foreign policy and its role in global health governance. As the world continues to face health crises, from pandemics to chronic diseases, the absence of US leadership raises questions about the organisation’s future effectiveness and stability.

Public health experts caution that diminished US involvement could:

  • Reduce the WHO’s ability to coordinate international responses to health emergencies.

  • Allow other nations, particularly China, to increase their influence within the organisation.

  • Undermine global trust in collaborative health initiatives.


Final Thoughts

The US withdrawal from the WHO under Trump’s leadership has ignited fierce debate about the balance between national interests and global cooperation in health governance. As this decision unfolds, its long-term consequences will likely shape the future of international public health efforts and America’s role on the world stage.

References:

  • CNN: Trump’s Executive Order on WHO Withdrawal

  • Georgetown University: Expert Commentary on Global Health Law

  • WHO Official Statements (pending response)

 

 

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top